Introduction
Romans
3:8 - Paul had been falsely accused of teaching, "let us do evil that good
may come."
*****************************************************
Paul
here denied believing this doctrine, but many people today do believe it, or
they reason as though they do. The idea is that we evaluate the goal or end
result that we hope to achieve, and if the goal seems honorable or upright,
then we conclude that whatever means or methods we might use to achieve that
goal would also be honorable or upright.
The
idea has several names: "Situation Ethics," "Moral
Relativity," "end justifies the means,"
"practicality," and other terms. One man called it "using the
devil's tools to do God's work."
The
purpose of this study is to consider what the Bible says about the idea that
the end justifies the means.
We want
to consider the Bible teaching about the concept then we will look at specific
applications in society.
I. Obedience Includes Both the Means and the End
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Paul
did not believe that we should do evil that good may come (Romans 3:8). Those
who so accused him were slandering him.
What
passage of Scripture would teach that the end justifies the means? Surely we
ought to be able to find the idea taught in Scripture if it is correct? Where
is it taught?
The
problem with this idea is that is simply one way to justify doing things
differently from what God said to do.
A. Many
Passages Forbid Doing Acts Different from What God Commanded.
======================================
Matthew
15:9,13 - We must not serve God according to human doctrine. Such practices
make worship vain; they are plants God did not plant and will be rooted up.
But
note that a doctrine is human if it differs in any way from what God, whether
in the end or the means. If God tells us what work to do and we do a different
work, we are following human teaching. Likewise, if God tells us what means to
use to do the work but we use a different means, we are still following human
teaching.
Galatians
1:8,9 - If we preach a different gospel we are accursed. But if what we justify
using a different means from what God's word says to use, we are teaching
differently from what the gospel says, just the same as if we pursue a
different goal from what He said.
2 John
9 - People who do not abide in Jesus' teaching, do not have God. To have the
Father and Son we must abide in Jesus' teaching. But if Jesus' teaching
specifies what means we should use as well as what end we should pursue, then
to pursue a different end or a different means is to fail to abide in His
teaching.
Colossians
3:17 - Whatever we do in word or deed must be done in Jesus' name - by His
authority. But "whatever we do" would include the means as well as
the ends we pursue. All must fit what He instructs in His word.
[2 Tim.
3:16,17; Jeremiah 10:23; Proverbs 14:12; 3:5,6; Revelation 22:18,19; 1 Timothy
1:3; 2 Timothy 1:13; John 5:43]
B.
God's Will May or May Not Specify the Means We Should Use.
========================================
Acts
3:22,23 - We must hearken to Jesus in all things He teaches or be destroyed.
When God's teaching specifies the means to a goal, we have no right to change
what He said. We must obey what He says both about the goal and about the means
to the goal. [Matthew 28:20]
Note
that, if God gives a goal but gives no guidelines regarding the means, then any
morally upright means would be justified.
*****************************************************
We have a name for this. We call it "general authority."
Genesis
6:14 - God told Noah to make an ark but gave no specifics about how to haul the
wood or how to cut it to the proper size. So had Noah used a saw to cut the
wood or a cart to haul it, he would have been doing right. The end would
authorize the means since God did not specify the means.
But this is not what people mean when they talk about "the
end justifies the means."
When
God specifies the means we should use to achieve a goal, then using other means
would constitute disobedience.
*****************************************************
This is
the problem with Situation Ethics or "the end justifies the means":
People seek to use some admirable goal to justify doing some act differently
from what God has commanded.
Genesis
6:14 - God told Noah to make the ark of gopher wood. God specified, not just
the end (the ark), but also the material to use. Had Noah used a different
substance, He would have disobeyed God. "The end justifies the means"
would argue it makes no difference what material is used as long as it
accomplished the goal of making an ark to spare the people and animals.
Genesis
6:22 - Noah did according to all that God commanded Him: that would include the
means and the end. Noah not only built an ark, he also used the material God
commanded.
So when
God teaches us an end to achieve and a means to use to achieve it, obedience
requires us to respect both the means and the end.
II. Bible Examples
>>>>>>>>>>>
Consider
some people in the Bible who had to learn that pursuing what they thought were
good ends did not justify using means that differed from what God had
instructed.
Old Testament
************
Leviticus
10:1,2 - Nadab and Abihu offered incense to God using fire that God had not
commanded them to use. Their goal was good: offering incense to worship God.
But God had told them what fire to use and they disregarded the means He
specified. God killed them. They learned too late that the end did not justify
using a different means.
1
Samuel 15:3,10-23 - God told Saul to destroy all the Amalekites and their flocks,
but Saul kept the best animals to offer sacrifice to God. Offering sacrifice to
God was "a good work," but it did not justify disregarding God's
command. God said Saul "has not performed my commandments" (v11) and
rejected him as king. "To obey is better than sacrifice" (v22). The
end did not justify a different means from what God had specified.
1
Chronicles 13:6,7,9,10 - David and Israel thought it was "good" to
bring the ark of the covenant back among them (vv 2,4). The end or goal was
"good." But while transporting it by ox cart, Uzzah touched it to
keep it from falling. God killed him.
Note 1
Chronicles 15:2,12-15 - God had appointed that the ark should be carried on
poles by priests and Levites. No one else could touch it [Num. 4:15-20]. God
killed Uzzah because they "did not consult Him about the proper
order." Moving the ark was good, but God had specified the "proper
order" to use. The end did not justify using a means different from what
God said.
2 Kings
5:9-14 - Elishah told Naaman to dip seven times in the Jordan and he would be
cleansed of leprosy. Being healed was a good end, but Naaman was furious
because he wanted a different means to accomplish the healing. He wanted
Elishah to wave his hand over the place (v11), or he wanted to dip in a
different river (v12). As long as he rejected the means God specified, he
remained a leper. He was cleansed only when he sought the end according to
God's means. The end did not justify using a different means.
[1
Samuel 13:8-14]
New Testament
************
Matthew
7:21-23 - Many think they please the Lord because they do "many wonderful
works" in His name. Their goals may be good. But He will say, "Depart
from me, you who practice lawlessness," because they are not doing the
will of the Father. Even when the end is good, we must still respect everything
else God specified.
Romans
10:1-3 - The Jews had a zeal for God but not according to knowledge. These
people served the true God and did so zealously. Surely that is a good goal. But
they set aside God's way of being righteous and pursued their own way of being
right. Paul said they needed to be saved. The end did not justify the means.
These
examples illustrate the principle we have learned: God requires complete
obedience to all that He has said. Not only must we pursue the goals that God
teaches, but we must also do it in the way He has said to do it.
III. Specific Applications: What about Today?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Consider
many specific areas in which people today are often guilty of disregarding
God's word on the grounds that "the end justifies the means."
Morality
=====
Abortion, euthanasia, suicide
************************
Most people agree murder is wrong. But society is in turmoil over
certain situations.
Many
reason that it is not good for people to suffer, so they justify killing an
unborn baby if it might be born handicapped or into poverty or if it was
conceived out of wedlock, etc.
Others
justify killing an elderly or seriously ill person - or helping them kill
themselves - if it helps them escape suffering and avoid being a burden to
others.
Germany justified the holocaust on the grounds that certain people
did not deserve to live.
Revelation
21:8; 22:15 - But God's word says those who commit murder will be in the lake
of fire, not in heaven. He nowhere grants an exception for people who are
elderly, sick, or unborn. Instead, He tells us to have mercy on such people and
help them through their hardships.
To justify killing such people is to argue that the end justifies
disobedience to God's word.
Sexual immorality
***************
Most
people will agree that it is best to reserve the sexual union for marriage. But
society is in turmoil about specific situations.
Many
justify young people having sexual relations or even living together before
marriage as long as they really "love" one another or so they can
learn whether or not they are compatible. "Don't you think love is good?
Don't you want young people to get along in marriage?"
Others
say that "love" justifies sexual relations and even marriage between
two people of the same gender. "What can be wrong if they really love one
another?"
Genesis
2:24; Hebrews 13:4; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 - But God's word says the sexual union
is for a man and a woman who are married to one another. Any other relationship
is fornication or adultery; and fornicators and homosexuals cannot enter the
kingdom of God.
Others
say that a couple can get a divorce if they are really unhappy together. Some
church members justify staying in unscriptural remarriages if separating would
work a severe hardship.
Matthew
19:9 - Jesus said the only Scriptural grounds to divorce ones spouse is for the
cause of fornication, and those who divorce for any other reason and remarry
commit adultery.
Happiness
and love are admirable goals, but they do not justify disobeying God's teaching
about marriage and sexual purity.
Gambling
*******
Many
people will justify gambling if its "for a good cause." Bingo and
raffles are acceptable for a charity or even a "church." States
operate or license lotteries, horse race betting, and even casinos saying the
money will be used for education.
1
Timothy 6:8-10; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 - But gambling is still fundamentally
greed (covetousness), which will keep people out of the kingdom of God. It is
based on a desire to get something for nothing instead of Scriptural means of
obtaining possessions (purchase, labor, or a gift of generosity). Its basic
appeal is love of money, which the Bible says it the root of all kinds of evil.
Whether for "a good cause" or not, gambling still
violates the teaching of God's word.
Lying
*****
Most people agree that people ought to tell the truth.
But
many justify telling "white lies" to achieve a good result (making
somebody feel better or avoid someone getting hurt).
Revelation
21:8,27; 22:14,15 - But God's word says "all liars" (not just some of
them) will have their part in the lake of fire, not in the eternal reward of
heaven.
Men
have justified every kind of evil on the grounds that it was done for "a
good cause." But all such rationalizing is based on the false concept that
the end justifies the means.
Worship
====
Instrumental music, choirs, quartets
*****************************
People
try to justify instrumental music and special singing groups in various ways,
but usually the "bottom line" is the "good" they think it
does. People enjoy it, so it can be used to lead young people and indifferent
people to enjoy worship. It makes people feel more spiritual, so they want to
attend church meetings, etc.
Ephesians
5:19; Colossians 3:16 - But God's word still simply says to sing in New
Testament worship. And God repeatedly warns us (as already shown) not to change
what He commands to follow our human wisdom and desires.
The
fundamental motivation behind instrumental music and similar activities is that
the end justifies the means: it's acceptable because of the effects it
produces. But God says "to obey is better than sacrifice." Remember
what happened to Nadab and Abihu for changing God's revealed order of worship.
Church income
************
Denominations
justify all kinds of fund-raising schemes (bingo, rummages, etc.) on the
grounds that the church needs the money.
1
Corinthians 16:1,2 - But God instructs New Testament congregations to obtain
the funds they need just by taking up a collection each first day of the week.
He provided no other means.
If what
we do in worship doesn't matter as long as the end result is good, why not rob
a bank and donate the loot to the church? "Oh, that would violate the
law." Exactly. So it isn't enough just to have a good end result. We must
obey the law - especially God's law - about everything. But God's word
specifies, not just the goal that He wants us to worship Him, but also the ways
we should use to worship Him. To change His pattern in these areas is to
disobey His law.
Church Organization and Work
==================
Support of human institutions
************************
Denominations
appoint people to all kinds of offices and central organizations that are
nowhere found in Scripture. When questioned, they often say these things help
organize their work and promote unity. So, the end justifies the means.
1 Peter
5:1-3; Acts 20:28 - Scripture teaches that the church the means we should use
to organize the work and promote unity. Each local church should be overseen by
qualified elders who oversee just the flock among them. For the directors of
some man-made organization to oversee the work or to centralize the work of
many churches under a central organization differs from what God's word says.
Now
many non-instrumental "churches of Christ" have established human
institutions and sponsoring churches to support works of benevolence or
evangelism. If we object, people say, "Look at the good being done: we're
supporting preachers and helping the needy." So, we are supposed to
overlook the fact the organizations are not Scriptural because someone has
decided the final result is "a good work": "the end justifies
the means."
The
reasoning is as wrong when "churches of Christ" use it as it is when
denominations use it. David learned that it was wrong to do a work without
first "consulting God about the proper order." People today need to
learn the same lesson. Good goals do not justify disobeying God's order of
church organization.
Carnal attractions and unauthorized works
***********************************
Many
denominations use parties, carnivals, clowns, sports, and entertainment of all
kinds to draw crowds. They support colleges, hospitals, and the whole Social
Gospel smorgasbord of works. When questioned about their methods, they point to
the large crowds that are being drawn and young people who have been attracted,
etc. "The end justifies the means."
Many
non-instrumental "churches of Christ" are involved in many of these
same works: parties, sports, using their buildings for banquets and meals and
"activities" for the young people. If you ask for Bible authority
they say, "Look at all the good we're doing" and "We've got to
do something to keep the young people." "The end justifies the means."
Such reasoning is just as wrong when "churches of Christ" do it as
when denominations do it.
1
Thessalonians 1:8; Acts 11:26; Romans 1:16; 2 Corinthians 10:3-5 - God has told
local churches what work they should do, and that work is primarily spiritual:
to spread the gospel and worship God so the lost can be saved and the saved can
grow in Christ. The method we use is gospel teaching, not carnal appeals to
people's fleshly desires. First-century churches followed God's word and grew
by telling people about Christ. [Philippians 4:14-18; 1 Timothy 3:15; Ephesians
4:15,16]
I've
known people who say, "I would rather do good, even in a wrong way, than
to not do it at all." But do we have only two choices: do it a wrong way
or don't do it at all? God is not pleased by either choice.
David,
Saul, and Naaman learned that it was wrong to do a work without first
"consulting God about the proper order." People today need to learn
the same lesson. Good goals do not justify disobeying God's order of church
work.
Conclusion
======
Matthew
28:20 - The saved should be taught to observe all things that Jesus commands,
not just part of it (Acts 3:22,23). Jesus' teaching often includes, not just
general goals, but specific information about what to do to achieve those
goals. We must observe "all" that He commands, including the means as
well as the end.
Nadab
and Abihu, King Saul, David, Naaman, and a host of other Bible characters
testify by their example that God wants us to do good works, but He wants us to
consult him about "the proper order." We must not neglect God's work,
but neither should we neglect His instructions about how to do His work.
Likewise,
the gospel often teaches how important it is for lost souls to be saved from
their sins. But the gospel also instructs us how we can be saved. Some people
have changed the teaching about how to be saved, but this too displeases God.
God says:
Mark 16:15,16 - He who believes and is baptized will be saved.
Acts 2:38 - Repent and be baptized for remission of sins.
If you
have not received salvation in the way God has ordained, you still need to be
saved. If you need to become a Christian or need to be restored to God's
service, why not obey today?
(C) Copyright 2012, David E. Pratte You are free to keep copies of this material on computer and/or in printed form for your own further study. If you have any other requests about the use of this material, please read our copyright guidelines at www.gospelway.com/copyrite.htm.